'Price-fixing' MSG Powder Firm Taken To Tribunal

"); jQuery("#212 h3").html("

Related News Programmes

"); });

2022-09-15 HKT 15:51

Share this story

facebook

  • The competition watchdog is taking legal action against a manufacturer over alleged resale price maintenance. File photo: RTHK

    The competition watchdog is taking legal action against a manufacturer over alleged resale price maintenance. File photo: RTHK

The Competition Commission is taking legal action against a seasoning manufacturer for allegedly imposing a minimum resale price when supplying MSG powder to its two main local distributors.

It is the first time the commission is bringing a case of resale price maintenance to the Competition Tribunal.

Resale price maintenance happens when a supplier establishes a fixed or minimum price for its distributors when they resell a product, preventing competition between them.

The competition watchdog on Thursday accused Tien Chu (Hong Kong) Company Limited of continuing to give effect to or engage in resale price maintenance arrangements that began in 2008 and lasted until at least September 2017.

It said Tien Chu allegedly issued notices, reminders and warnings to ensure the distributors did not sell its MSG powder, known as "Finger Citron Ve-Tsin Gourmet Powder", for less than a particular price.

When one of the distributors began complaining in 2016 that the other was snatching customers through lower prices, the commission said, Tien Chu took action to secure compliance with the resale prices it had set, including by using disincentives, threats and penalties.

"The commission has reasonable cause to believe that Tien Chu engaged in [resale price maintenance] conduct which had the object of harming competition in Hong Kong... and constituted serious anti-competitive conduct as defined in the [Competition] ordinance," the watchdog said.

"The commission attempted to resolve the matter by issuing an infringement notice to Tien Chu with specific requirements to be fulfilled. Tien Chu did not agree to offer a commitment to comply with those requirements, thus resulting in the current proceeding against it."

The watchdog said it is seeking remedies before the tribunal, such as an order to impose pecuniary penalty on the manufacturer in question.

The commission said it would not pursue the two distributors in this case.

RECENT NEWS

TOPPAN Edge Becomes Japans First Qualified VLEI Issuer

The Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) has announced TOPPAN Edge, a subsidiary of TOPPAN Holdings that p... Read more

SFC And Dubais DFSA Partner On Cross-Border Regulatory Cooperation

The Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), the independent regulator of the Dubai International Financial Centre (D... Read more

Toss To Launch Finance Super-App In Australia, Plans Won-Based Stablecoin

South Korea’s fintech unicorn Toss is preparing to launch its finance super-app in Australia before the end of this y... Read more

China Funds Research On Stablecoins And Cross-Border Oversight

China’s largest government-backed research funder has begun accepting applications for studies on stablecoins and the... Read more

XTransfer, CZBank Shanghai Branch Form Cross-Border Finance Partnership

XTransfer has entered into a partnership with the Shanghai branch of China Zheshang Bank (CZBank). The agreement was si... Read more

Brinc Launches VentureVerse Through Acquisition Of OG Club

Brinc, a Hong Kong-based venture acceleration and corporate innovation firm, has acquired OG Club, a decentralised auto... Read more