'Jury In Yoga Ball Murder Trial Was Misdirected'

"); jQuery("#212 h3").html("

Related News Programmes

"); });

2020-12-17 HKT 17:40

Share this story

facebook

  • Khaw Kim-sun, 55, is challenging his conviction for murdering his wife and daughter in 2015. File photo: RTHK

    Khaw Kim-sun, 55, is challenging his conviction for murdering his wife and daughter in 2015. File photo: RTHK

The Court of Appeal has been told that a trial judge misdirected the jury which found a former CUHK professor guilty of murdering his wife and daughter using a yoga ball filled with toxic gas.

Khaw Kim-sun, 55, who was an associate professor at the university's department of anaesthesia and intensive care, was sentenced to life in prison in 2018 after a High Court jury unanimously decided that he was guilty of murdering his 47-year-old wife Wong Siew-fing, and 16-year-old daughter Lily.

Prosecutors said the anaesthesiologist put a yoga ball which was leaking carbon monoxide in the boot of a Mini Cooper driven by his wife.

Khaw’s wife and daughter died of carbon monoxide poisoning after they were found unconscious in the car which was parked near their home on the afternoon of May 22, 2015.

Khaw did not mention anything about the yoga ball during his first meeting with police officers in 2015, but admitted when he was arrested in 2016 that he had brought home the yoga ball filled with gas.

On Thursday, his lawyer, Christopher Grounds, argued that High Court judge Judianna Barnes should have made it clear to the jury that Khaw had only been exercising his right to silence during his first meeting with the police, saying Barnes’ failure to do so may have led the jury to question Khaw’s honesty.

Grounds argued that when Barnes offered a summary of the case to the jurors immediately before their deliberations, she wrongly “drew to their attention” the fact that Khaw had not spoken about the yoga ball the first time he spoke to police.

But the prosecution said this issue had not been challenged during the trial, adding that Khaw had been represented by his lawyers throughout the legal process and had been aware of his rights.

Throughout the appeal hearing, Khaw appeared focused as he sat in the dock, occasionally scribbling notes.

At least three times he handed notes he had written to his lawyers.

The hearing was adjourned with the ruling to come at a later date.

RECENT NEWS

HSBC Launches TradeCash In Hong Kong To Accelerate Trade Finance Access

HSBC has launched a digital trade finance tool called HSBC TradeCash, allowing businesses in Hong Kong to upload sales ... Read more

HKEX And HKMA Launch Pilot On E-HKD For After-Hours Margin Payments

Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX) and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) have launched a joint pilot... Read more

Can You Trust AI Agents To Stay Within Your Intent?

Checking someone’s ID at the door of a nightclub tells you who they are, but it does not tell you how they will behav... Read more

China CITIC Bank Taps Tencent Cloud For Fintech 2.0 Banking Push In Hong Kong

Tencent Cloud has signed a strategic cooperation agreement with China CITIC Bank International (CNCBI) to support the d... Read more

Payful Launches Cloud-Based Visa Charge Card Programme Via BPC SmartVista

Chinese cross-border payment company Payful has launched a cloud-native Visa charge-card programme for corporate and me... Read more

Hong Kong Banking Taskforce Convenes To Plan Northern Metropolis Financing

The Northern Metropolis Financial Advisory Taskforce held its inaugural meeting on 17 June to discuss the financing nee... Read more