Teresa Cheng: I'll Make Decisions On Security Law

"); jQuery("#212 h3").html("

Related News Programmes

"); });

2020-06-06 HKT 10:40

Share this story

facebook

  • Teresa Cheng: I'll make decisions on security law

Secretary for Justice Teresa Cheng says she and her department will retain the power to lay charges under Beijing's new national security legislation for the SAR.

The National People's Congress approved draft legislation last month, while the NPC's Standing Committee is still to work on details of the law, but Cheng said the Basic Law made clear that the Department of Justice was responsible for deciding whether to charge a suspect.

The law is expected to criminalise acts or activities relating to secession, subversion or terrorism, as well as foreign interference in the SAR. It's also expected to pave the way for national security agents to operate in the SAR.

"Under the Basic Law Article 63, the Department of Justice is responsible for all criminal prosecution matters without any interference," she said.

"So therefore we will will make our decision in relation to whether or not to prosecute in accordance with the law, the evidence and the relevant prosecution code."

Asked how her department would cooperate with mainland security agencies, which are expected to be allowed to operate in Hong Kong under the new law, Cheng said it would base decisions on files from the "relevant law enforcement agency", which would "probably" be the police.

She also played down differences between Hong Kong's common law system and the civil law system under which mainland courts operate. She said both shared similar principles, including a presumption of innocence and putting the burden of proof on prosecutors.

Asked whether the national security law would apply retrospectively, she said there were limited circumstances in which it might do.

"Of course at the moment nobody has seen the draft legislation so it's not possible to say what is going to happen there," Cheng said. "But so far as retrospectivity is concerned, as a matter of principle, criminal charges are not to be laid retrospectively, therefore there ought not to be retrospective effect when the law is legislated.

"However there is always some exception, when the exception arises in relation to treaty and customary international law, but there are generally a very small amount of situations."

RECENT NEWS

Is Hong Kongs Default Life Insurance Choice A Wealth Drain?

Hong Kong is a city that takes financial security seriously, boasting one of the highest insurance penetration rates in... Read more

RedotPay Secures $107M Series B, Total Funding Hits $194M

RedotPay, a global stablecoin-based payment fintech, has closed a US$107 million Series B round, bringing its total cap... Read more

91% Of Hong Kong Merchants Lose Revenue To Payment Friction

Aspire has released its Hong Kong Ecommerce Pulse Check 2025, highlighting that while mid-sized ecommerce merchants rem... Read more

Do Kwon Faces Possible Trial In Korea After US Conviction

Do Kwon, the crypto tycoon behind the 2022 collapse of TerraUSD and Luna, caused an estimated US$40 billion in investor... Read more

Startale, SBI Holdings To Develop Japans Regulated Yen Stablecoin

Startale Group and SBI Holdings have signed a MoU to jointly develop and launch a fully regulated Japanese yen-denomina... Read more

KakaoBank Expands In Indonesia Through Superbank Partnership

KakaoBank, South Korea’s largest internet-only bank, is accelerating its global expansion through a deepened partners... Read more