Subversion Suspects Denied Answer On Jury Trial Query

"); jQuery("#212 h3").html("

Related News Programmes

"); });

2021-05-31 HKT 18:56

Share this story

facebook

  • Chief Magistrate Victor So said he had no authority to instruct prosecutors to answer questions from defence lawyers on whether 47 pro-democracy figures charged with subversion would receive a jury trial. File photo: RTHK

    Chief Magistrate Victor So said he had no authority to instruct prosecutors to answer questions from defence lawyers on whether 47 pro-democracy figures charged with subversion would receive a jury trial. File photo: RTHK

Forty-seven people accused of national security crimes related to last year’s pan-democratic primaries appeared in court on Monday, with the counsel for several defendants questioning whether they would receive a jury trial. However, they did not receive any answer.

The lawyer – representing Leung Kwok-hung, Jimmy Sham and Lester Shum – also asked Chief Magistrate Victor So during a hearing at West Kowloon Magistracy whether the trial would be open to the public, and if prosecutors intend to paint the defendants as masterminds or active participants of the alleged conspiracy to commit subversion.

He said the answers would determine whether they plead guilty or not.

Under Article 22 of the national security law, people deemed to be 'principal offenders' or those who commit an offence of a grave nature face between 10 years to life in prison; those found to have ‘actively participated’ in a subversion plot can get jail terms ranging from three to 10 years; while ‘other participants’ get a maximum penalty of three years’ imprisonment.

In response, the magistrate said he had no authority to instruct the prosecution to seek clarification on these matters from the Secretary for Justice.

These questions come days after a High Court judge decided in a separate national security case that the trial for defendant Tong Ying-kit would be held without a jury.

The judge had ruled that jury trials are not a constitutional right.

Meanwhile, So also rejected a separate request from other defence lawyers for more time to provide legal advice to their clients.

They had cited difficulties in meeting some defendants who have been kept in custody since their arrest in late February.

Again, So said he had no authority to make instructions to the prosecution.

All 47 defendants are due to appear before the court again on July 8 before their case is transferred to the High Court.

Eleven of them were granted bail, while the rest were remanded in custody. Bail applications for ten defendants will be heard over the next two days.

RECENT NEWS

SBI Holdings To Acquire Bitbank In US$289M Crypto Expansion

SBI Holdings has agreed to acquire Japanese crypto exchange Bitbank in a deal valued at approximately US$289 million, w... Read more

4 Ways Hong Kong Banks Fight Financial Crime Using AI, According To HKMA

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) wants banks to use AI in financial crime as a way to counter cyberattacks and s... Read more

Ripple Launches RLUSD Stablecoin In Japan Through SBI Group

Ripple has launched its US dollar-denominated stablecoin, Ripple USD, in the Japanese market. The expansion follows reg... Read more

SBI And Startale Launch Trust Bank-Backed Yen Stablecoin JPYSC In Japan

SBI Group has introduced its trust based stablecoin JPYSC in partnership with Singapore-based fintech company Startale ... Read more

Visa Study: Digital Wallets Lead Greater Bay Area Payment Preferences

Visa has released its latest Consumer Payment Attitudes Study, highlighting how payment seamlessness is linked to a shi... Read more

European And South Korean Banks Form Project Pangea For FX Settlement

Chainlink, South Korean infrastructure provider FairSquareLab, the Unified Korea Alliance (UniKA), and European stablec... Read more