RTHK Accepted Warning Over Headliner, Court Told
"); jQuery("#212 h3").html("

"); jQuery(document).ready(function() { jwplayer.key='EKOtdBrvhiKxeOU807UIF56TaHWapYjKnFiG7ipl3gw='; var playerInstance = jwplayer("jquery_jwplayer_1"); playerInstance.setup({ file: "https://newsstatic.rthk.hk/audios/mfile_1594889_1_20210608180615.mp3", skin: { url: location.href.split('/', 4).join('/') + '/jwplayer/skin/rthk/five.css', name: 'five' }, hlshtml: true, width: "100%", height: 30, wmode: 'transparent', primary: navigator.userAgent.indexOf("Trident")>-1 ? "flash" : "html5", events: { onPlay: function(event) { dcsMultiTrack('DCS.dcsuri', 'https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1594889-20210608.mp3', 'WT.ti', ' Audio at newsfeed', 'WT.cg_n', '#rthknews', 'WT.cg_s', 'Multimedia','WT.es','https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1594889-20210608.htm', 'DCS.dcsqry', '' ); } } }); }); });
2021-06-08 HKT 17:26
Lawyers representing the Communications Authority said on Tuesday that a warning the body issued to RTHK over an episode of its now-suspended
Headlinershow did not undermine freedom of speech.
Senior counsel Abraham Chan told the High Court during a judicial review hearing over the ruling that it was plainly insulting to the police when the show’s host, dressed in a police uniform, emerged from a rubbish bin.
Chan said as the government station was only told to observe more closely the Code of Practice on Television Programme Standards, future productions would not be hindered.
He noted that the station had accepted the ruling, and said the applicants of the judicial review – RTHK’s Programme Staff Union and the Hong Kong Journalists Association – did not represent the station.
He said while the authority did not take issue with criticism against the police force, the media must not exceed reasonable boundaries when exercising their freedom of expression.
He said RTHK should have considered the social sentiment when producing the Headliner episode that was aired in early 2020, when the relationship between the police and the public was frayed and further social unrest might be possible.
In response, senior counsel Johannes Chan, representing the union and association, said there was no evidence showing that the authority had taken into account the 2019 protests in its ruling, adding that the episode in question was only about the pandemic.
He also rejected suggestions that he had played up the show’s satirical nature to dismiss the need for factually correct content, saying satire cannot be produced without a certain degree of exaggeration or distortion.
Justice Anderson Chow reserved judgement to a later date.
HSBC Tests Blockchain-Based Issuance For Structured Products In Hong Kong
HSBC has completed a private placement of its first digitally native structured product in Hong Kong. The bank issued U... Read more
OSL Group Secures Austrian MiCAR License To Expand European Crypto Services
OSL Group has secured authorisation as a Crypto-Asset Service Provider (CASP) from the Austrian Financial Market Author... Read more
SFC Requires Brokers And Crypto Platforms To Stop Using OTPs For Client Login
The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has ordered internet brokers and virtual asset trading platforms in Hong Ko... Read more
Hang Seng Bank Integrates Alipay+ For Cross-Border QR Payments
Hang Seng Bank has partnered with Alipay+ to enable its customers to make cross-border QR payments directly through the... Read more
Animoca Brands And Visa Pilot AI Agent Shopping In Hong Kong
Animoca Brands has completed a live pilot of AI-powered commerce capabilities in Hong Kong, developed in collaboration ... Read more
GIM Closes US$20M Series A To Build Agentic AI Systems For Capital Markets
Grace Investment Machine (GIM) has secured US$20 million in a Series A funding round to develop agentic AI systems for ... Read more
