RTHK Accepted Warning Over Headliner, Court Told

"); jQuery("#212 h3").html("

"); jQuery(document).ready(function() { jwplayer.key='EKOtdBrvhiKxeOU807UIF56TaHWapYjKnFiG7ipl3gw='; var playerInstance = jwplayer("jquery_jwplayer_1"); playerInstance.setup({ file: "https://newsstatic.rthk.hk/audios/mfile_1594889_1_20210608180615.mp3", skin: { url: location.href.split('/', 4).join('/') + '/jwplayer/skin/rthk/five.css', name: 'five' }, hlshtml: true, width: "100%", height: 30, wmode: 'transparent', primary: navigator.userAgent.indexOf("Trident")>-1 ? "flash" : "html5", events: { onPlay: function(event) { dcsMultiTrack('DCS.dcsuri', 'https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1594889-20210608.mp3', 'WT.ti', ' Audio at newsfeed', 'WT.cg_n', '#rthknews', 'WT.cg_s', 'Multimedia','WT.es','https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1594889-20210608.htm', 'DCS.dcsqry', '' ); } } }); }); });
2021-06-08 HKT 17:26
Lawyers representing the Communications Authority said on Tuesday that a warning the body issued to RTHK over an episode of its now-suspended
Headlinershow did not undermine freedom of speech.
Senior counsel Abraham Chan told the High Court during a judicial review hearing over the ruling that it was plainly insulting to the police when the show’s host, dressed in a police uniform, emerged from a rubbish bin.
Chan said as the government station was only told to observe more closely the Code of Practice on Television Programme Standards, future productions would not be hindered.
He noted that the station had accepted the ruling, and said the applicants of the judicial review – RTHK’s Programme Staff Union and the Hong Kong Journalists Association – did not represent the station.
He said while the authority did not take issue with criticism against the police force, the media must not exceed reasonable boundaries when exercising their freedom of expression.
He said RTHK should have considered the social sentiment when producing the Headliner episode that was aired in early 2020, when the relationship between the police and the public was frayed and further social unrest might be possible.
In response, senior counsel Johannes Chan, representing the union and association, said there was no evidence showing that the authority had taken into account the 2019 protests in its ruling, adding that the episode in question was only about the pandemic.
He also rejected suggestions that he had played up the show’s satirical nature to dismiss the need for factually correct content, saying satire cannot be produced without a certain degree of exaggeration or distortion.
Justice Anderson Chow reserved judgement to a later date.
Adyen And JCB Launch Card-on-File Tokenisation To Boost Payment Security
Adyen and JCB Co., Ltd. have launched JCB’s card-on-file (COF) tokenisation service, designed to improve the securit... Read more
Hong Kongs Cashless Future Is Closer Than You Think
A recent Worldpay report indicated that the digital wallets Hong Kong has could dominate its payment landscape by 2030.... Read more
HKMA Green Fintech Competition Open For Submissions
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) announced the launch of the 2025 Green Fintech Competition on 9 May 2025. It is... Read more
HSBC Launches Refreshed Hong Kong App With Smarter, Personalised Features
HSBC Hong Kong announced the launch of it refreshed HSBC HK App on 7 May 2025, set to roll out by phases beginning mid-... Read more
Chubb Life Hong Kong Launches Health Up Insurance For The Tech-Savvy
Chubb Life Hong Kong introduced the Health Up Insurance Plan (Health Up) on 7 May 2025. The Chubb Health Up Insurance d... Read more
Ant International Eyes Hong Kong IPO, In Talks With Regulators
Ant Group, a subsidiary of China’s Alibaba Group, is reportedly planning to list its overseas branch, Ant Internation... Read more