RTHK Accepted Warning Over Headliner, Court Told
"); jQuery("#212 h3").html("

"); jQuery(document).ready(function() { jwplayer.key='EKOtdBrvhiKxeOU807UIF56TaHWapYjKnFiG7ipl3gw='; var playerInstance = jwplayer("jquery_jwplayer_1"); playerInstance.setup({ file: "https://newsstatic.rthk.hk/audios/mfile_1594889_1_20210608180615.mp3", skin: { url: location.href.split('/', 4).join('/') + '/jwplayer/skin/rthk/five.css', name: 'five' }, hlshtml: true, width: "100%", height: 30, wmode: 'transparent', primary: navigator.userAgent.indexOf("Trident")>-1 ? "flash" : "html5", events: { onPlay: function(event) { dcsMultiTrack('DCS.dcsuri', 'https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1594889-20210608.mp3', 'WT.ti', ' Audio at newsfeed', 'WT.cg_n', '#rthknews', 'WT.cg_s', 'Multimedia','WT.es','https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1594889-20210608.htm', 'DCS.dcsqry', '' ); } } }); }); });
2021-06-08 HKT 17:26
Lawyers representing the Communications Authority said on Tuesday that a warning the body issued to RTHK over an episode of its now-suspended
Headlinershow did not undermine freedom of speech.
Senior counsel Abraham Chan told the High Court during a judicial review hearing over the ruling that it was plainly insulting to the police when the show’s host, dressed in a police uniform, emerged from a rubbish bin.
Chan said as the government station was only told to observe more closely the Code of Practice on Television Programme Standards, future productions would not be hindered.
He noted that the station had accepted the ruling, and said the applicants of the judicial review – RTHK’s Programme Staff Union and the Hong Kong Journalists Association – did not represent the station.
He said while the authority did not take issue with criticism against the police force, the media must not exceed reasonable boundaries when exercising their freedom of expression.
He said RTHK should have considered the social sentiment when producing the Headliner episode that was aired in early 2020, when the relationship between the police and the public was frayed and further social unrest might be possible.
In response, senior counsel Johannes Chan, representing the union and association, said there was no evidence showing that the authority had taken into account the 2019 protests in its ruling, adding that the episode in question was only about the pandemic.
He also rejected suggestions that he had played up the show’s satirical nature to dismiss the need for factually correct content, saying satire cannot be produced without a certain degree of exaggeration or distortion.
Justice Anderson Chow reserved judgement to a later date.
Ant International And Bank Of China Partner To Enhance Cross-Border Payment Connectivity
Ant International and Bank of China (Hong Kong) (“BOCHK”) announced a partnership which leverages BOCHK’s banking... Read more
BitGo Korea Gets Green Light For Virtual Asset Custody, Backed By SK Telecom
BitGo Holdings, Inc. (BitGo) announced that its subsidiary, BitGo Korea, Inc. (BitGo Korea), received its Virtual Asset... Read more
Webinar: When Account Takeover Moves Past Onboarding
Account takeover shows why fraud risk cannot be treated as an onboarding problem. Fraudsters are using stolen credentia... Read more
JCB To Trial Stablecoin Payments In Japan With Digital Garage And Lawson
JCB Co., Ltd. (JCB), Digital Garage, Inc. (Digital Garage), and Lawson, Inc. (Lawson) announced that they have jointly ... Read more
Bonnie Chan To Lead HKEX Until Feb 2030 After Securing Second Term
The HKEX Board of Directors has approved the renewal of the employment contract of Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Lim... Read more
Ripple Signs Its First Korean Regional Bank In Cross-Border Remittance Deal
Ripple, a blockchain-based enterprise solutions provider for traditional and digital finance, announced a partnership w... Read more
