RTHK Accepted Warning Over Headliner, Court Told
"); jQuery("#212 h3").html("

"); jQuery(document).ready(function() { jwplayer.key='EKOtdBrvhiKxeOU807UIF56TaHWapYjKnFiG7ipl3gw='; var playerInstance = jwplayer("jquery_jwplayer_1"); playerInstance.setup({ file: "https://newsstatic.rthk.hk/audios/mfile_1594889_1_20210608180615.mp3", skin: { url: location.href.split('/', 4).join('/') + '/jwplayer/skin/rthk/five.css', name: 'five' }, hlshtml: true, width: "100%", height: 30, wmode: 'transparent', primary: navigator.userAgent.indexOf("Trident")>-1 ? "flash" : "html5", events: { onPlay: function(event) { dcsMultiTrack('DCS.dcsuri', 'https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1594889-20210608.mp3', 'WT.ti', ' Audio at newsfeed', 'WT.cg_n', '#rthknews', 'WT.cg_s', 'Multimedia','WT.es','https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1594889-20210608.htm', 'DCS.dcsqry', '' ); } } }); }); });
2021-06-08 HKT 17:26
Lawyers representing the Communications Authority said on Tuesday that a warning the body issued to RTHK over an episode of its now-suspended
Headlinershow did not undermine freedom of speech.
Senior counsel Abraham Chan told the High Court during a judicial review hearing over the ruling that it was plainly insulting to the police when the show’s host, dressed in a police uniform, emerged from a rubbish bin.
Chan said as the government station was only told to observe more closely the Code of Practice on Television Programme Standards, future productions would not be hindered.
He noted that the station had accepted the ruling, and said the applicants of the judicial review – RTHK’s Programme Staff Union and the Hong Kong Journalists Association – did not represent the station.
He said while the authority did not take issue with criticism against the police force, the media must not exceed reasonable boundaries when exercising their freedom of expression.
He said RTHK should have considered the social sentiment when producing the Headliner episode that was aired in early 2020, when the relationship between the police and the public was frayed and further social unrest might be possible.
In response, senior counsel Johannes Chan, representing the union and association, said there was no evidence showing that the authority had taken into account the 2019 protests in its ruling, adding that the episode in question was only about the pandemic.
He also rejected suggestions that he had played up the show’s satirical nature to dismiss the need for factually correct content, saying satire cannot be produced without a certain degree of exaggeration or distortion.
Justice Anderson Chow reserved judgement to a later date.
Democrat Candidate In Key Senate Race Reiterates Cost-Of-Living Message Ahead Of Midterms, Dismisses 'Faith'-Related Attacks
Abdul El-Sayed, who is running for Senate against Republican Mike Rogers in Michigan, said that his opponent's only stra... Read more
Sanders Calls For Criminal Prosecution Of AI CEOs After Model Submitted A False Homicide Tip To Police
Two-time presidential candidate Bernie Sanders made the statement after news emerged that an Anthropic AI model sent the... Read more
Palestinian Authority Postpones Elections, Citing Israeli Restrictions. Israel Denies The Charges.
Palestinian President Abbas said that long-awaited legislative elections, due to be held in November, would be postponed... Read more
Riyadh Airport Evacuated After Houthi Strike. This Is The Latest In A Series Of Attacks Against Saudi Aviation.
The Houthis hit Terminal 3 of the King Khalid International Airport of the Saudi capital of Riyadh on Saturday, just day... Read more
Meme Coin Rug Pulls Keep Burning New Buyers: $MT Launchpad Now Publishes Their Code First
Rug pulls keep costing meme coin buyers. Launchpads like MemeToro now publish their contract code first. Here's what to ... Read more
U.S.-Russia Diesel Agreement Angers Zelensky. Russia Attacked After The Deal Was Announced.
The Ukrainian leader called the agreement between Moscow and Washington, which will see hundreds of thousands of tons of... Read more
