RTHK Accepted Warning Over Headliner, Court Told
"); jQuery("#212 h3").html("

"); jQuery(document).ready(function() { jwplayer.key='EKOtdBrvhiKxeOU807UIF56TaHWapYjKnFiG7ipl3gw='; var playerInstance = jwplayer("jquery_jwplayer_1"); playerInstance.setup({ file: "https://newsstatic.rthk.hk/audios/mfile_1594889_1_20210608180615.mp3", skin: { url: location.href.split('/', 4).join('/') + '/jwplayer/skin/rthk/five.css', name: 'five' }, hlshtml: true, width: "100%", height: 30, wmode: 'transparent', primary: navigator.userAgent.indexOf("Trident")>-1 ? "flash" : "html5", events: { onPlay: function(event) { dcsMultiTrack('DCS.dcsuri', 'https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1594889-20210608.mp3', 'WT.ti', ' Audio at newsfeed', 'WT.cg_n', '#rthknews', 'WT.cg_s', 'Multimedia','WT.es','https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1594889-20210608.htm', 'DCS.dcsqry', '' ); } } }); }); });
2021-06-08 HKT 17:26
Lawyers representing the Communications Authority said on Tuesday that a warning the body issued to RTHK over an episode of its now-suspended
Headlinershow did not undermine freedom of speech.
Senior counsel Abraham Chan told the High Court during a judicial review hearing over the ruling that it was plainly insulting to the police when the show’s host, dressed in a police uniform, emerged from a rubbish bin.
Chan said as the government station was only told to observe more closely the Code of Practice on Television Programme Standards, future productions would not be hindered.
He noted that the station had accepted the ruling, and said the applicants of the judicial review – RTHK’s Programme Staff Union and the Hong Kong Journalists Association – did not represent the station.
He said while the authority did not take issue with criticism against the police force, the media must not exceed reasonable boundaries when exercising their freedom of expression.
He said RTHK should have considered the social sentiment when producing the Headliner episode that was aired in early 2020, when the relationship between the police and the public was frayed and further social unrest might be possible.
In response, senior counsel Johannes Chan, representing the union and association, said there was no evidence showing that the authority had taken into account the 2019 protests in its ruling, adding that the episode in question was only about the pandemic.
He also rejected suggestions that he had played up the show’s satirical nature to dismiss the need for factually correct content, saying satire cannot be produced without a certain degree of exaggeration or distortion.
Justice Anderson Chow reserved judgement to a later date.
A16z Crypto Opens First Office In Seoul To Expand In Asia
a16z crypto, the crypto-focused arm of Andreessen Horowitz, has announced its expansion into Asia with the opening of i... Read more
Trio AI And AbbyPay Partner To Integrate AI Into Payment Processing
Trio AI, a Hong Kong-based AI infrastructure service provider, has signed a MouU with AbbyPay, a POS-free digital payme... Read more
Modernising Bank Payments: How Banks Can Win In Merchant Acquiring
Banks have been the backbone of merchant acquiring. Their regulatory strength, trusted brands, and long-standing mercha... Read more
KPay Enables Tap To Pay On IPhone For Hong Kong Merchants
KPay now allows its Hong Kong merchants to accept in-person contactless payments using Tap to Pay on iPhone. The featur... Read more
HashKey Group IPO Targets Up To HK1.67 Billion In Hong Kong Listing
Licensed crypto exchange HashKey Group is intending to raise as much as HK$1.67 billion in its Hong Kong initial public... Read more
Endowus Launches Income Enhanced Portfolio For Professional Investors
Endowus, an independent wealth advisor and investment platform in Asia, has launched its Income Enhanced Portfolio, ava... Read more
