RTHK Accepted Warning Over Headliner, Court Told

"); jQuery("#212 h3").html("

"); jQuery(document).ready(function() { jwplayer.key='EKOtdBrvhiKxeOU807UIF56TaHWapYjKnFiG7ipl3gw='; var playerInstance = jwplayer("jquery_jwplayer_1"); playerInstance.setup({ file: "https://newsstatic.rthk.hk/audios/mfile_1594889_1_20210608180615.mp3", skin: { url: location.href.split('/', 4).join('/') + '/jwplayer/skin/rthk/five.css', name: 'five' }, hlshtml: true, width: "100%", height: 30, wmode: 'transparent', primary: navigator.userAgent.indexOf("Trident")>-1 ? "flash" : "html5", events: { onPlay: function(event) { dcsMultiTrack('DCS.dcsuri', 'https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1594889-20210608.mp3', 'WT.ti', ' Audio at newsfeed', 'WT.cg_n', '#rthknews', 'WT.cg_s', 'Multimedia','WT.es','https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1594889-20210608.htm', 'DCS.dcsqry', '' ); } } }); }); });
2021-06-08 HKT 17:26
Lawyers representing the Communications Authority said on Tuesday that a warning the body issued to RTHK over an episode of its now-suspended
Headlinershow did not undermine freedom of speech.
Senior counsel Abraham Chan told the High Court during a judicial review hearing over the ruling that it was plainly insulting to the police when the show’s host, dressed in a police uniform, emerged from a rubbish bin.
Chan said as the government station was only told to observe more closely the Code of Practice on Television Programme Standards, future productions would not be hindered.
He noted that the station had accepted the ruling, and said the applicants of the judicial review – RTHK’s Programme Staff Union and the Hong Kong Journalists Association – did not represent the station.
He said while the authority did not take issue with criticism against the police force, the media must not exceed reasonable boundaries when exercising their freedom of expression.
He said RTHK should have considered the social sentiment when producing the Headliner episode that was aired in early 2020, when the relationship between the police and the public was frayed and further social unrest might be possible.
In response, senior counsel Johannes Chan, representing the union and association, said there was no evidence showing that the authority had taken into account the 2019 protests in its ruling, adding that the episode in question was only about the pandemic.
He also rejected suggestions that he had played up the show’s satirical nature to dismiss the need for factually correct content, saying satire cannot be produced without a certain degree of exaggeration or distortion.
Justice Anderson Chow reserved judgement to a later date.
2025 Hong Kong Fintech Report: What You Need To Know
Hong Kong is hitting the gas when it comes to fintech innovation, regulation and adoption. From the passage of the Stab... Read more
DigiFT Secures SFC Licenses To Offer Tokenised Asset Services In Hong Kong
DigiFT, a Singapore-based digital asset platform focused on institutional-grade tokenised real-world assets (RWAs), has... Read more
JCB Contactless Cards Now Accepted On Shanghai And Beijing Subways
Japan’s JCB has announced that JCB cardholders can now use their contactless cards to access the subway systems in Sh... Read more
Hong Kong Sets Out Next Phase Of Digital Asset Policy
Hong Kong’s Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB) has issued an updated policy statement setting out the ... Read more
Hong Kong Overtakes Singapore In Wealthtech Adoption
Across Asia-Pacific (APAC)’s key wealth management hubs, Hong Kong is emerging as the frontrunner in wealthtech, over... Read more
Chinas AI Capex To Hit 700 Billion Yuan In 2025 Amid US Tech Rivalry
Capital expenditure on AI in China is expected to reach between 600 billion yuan and 700 billion yuan (US$84 billion to... Read more