Dropping A Bill Over Mass Action Not Good: Regina Ip

"); jQuery("#212 h3").html("

"); });
2020-06-10 HKT 14:05
Executive councillor Regina Ip on Wednesday said the government should either have shelved its controversial extradition bill before public opposition built up against it last year, or it should have finished the job in pushing the legislation through Legco despite huge public protests.
Ip told a radio programme that she never supports the dropping of a legislation over mass protests as governments should not be seen as yielding to such actions.
She was speaking after Chief Executive Carrie Lam on Tuesday said both the government and lawmakers must ‘learn a lesson’ from the saga – on the one year anniversary of a massive march of an estimated one million people, that kicked off months of increasingly violent protests.
Ip said that in retrospect, she and other government advisers perhaps should have told the government to pull the bill months before it was formally withdrawn last October.
However, she stressed that this should have been done even before public opposition mounted against the legislation, as the government should not be seen to yield to mass protests.
"Due to the government's failure to counter the publicity launched by the opposition, a lot of fear had been stirred up. I never support withdrawing an important piece of legislation just because of mass mobilisation," she said.
“I think that would encourage more mass mobilisation and undermine the government's capacity to govern. So the lesson to learn is maybe we should have advised the chief executive much earlier than June 9 to withdraw the bill."
Ip resigned as Secretary for Security in 2003 after a failed attempt to enact national security legislation under Article 23 of the Basic Law, that was shelved after mass protests.
She also told a radio programme that the controversial bill could have been passed last year despite the protests, if pro-establishment lawmakers had been better prepared and had stayed in the chamber overnight ahead of the vote.
“If [the government] pushes ahead, they should have ensured [that it passes.] You can’t pass the legislation even with 42 [pro-establishment lawmakers]?”
The Legco meeting on June 12, 2019 was ultimately cancelled as thousands of protesters surrounded the complex, and police responded with tear gas, rubber bullets and bean bag rounds.
Ip also said the government is in some degree responsible for Beijing’s decision to directly impose a national security law on Hong Kong, since it had failed to fulfil its constitutional duty to do this for 23 years after the handover in 1997.
She said there will be more room for "Two Systems" the sooner Hong Kong fulfills this duty.
China CITIC Bank Launches Payment Connect Services To Support Cross-Border Transactions
China CITIC Bank International Limited (CNCBI) has announced it will introduce services and a customer offer related to... Read more
Eddid Financial Secures SFC Approval For Digital Asset Services
Hong Kong’s Eddid Financial has announced that its subsidiary, Eddid Securities and Futures, has received approval fr... Read more
Hong Kong Customs Uncovers HK$1.15B Virtual Asset Money Laundering Scheme
Hong Kong Customs has uncovered a suspected money laundering operation involving cash smuggling and virtual assets tota... Read more
Lendela Partners With TransUnion To Launch Free Credit Score Tool In Hong Kong
Lendela, a loan matching platform based in Hong Kong, has partnered with credit reference agency TransUnion through a c... Read more
Hex Trust Appoints Rohit Apte As Head Of Markets
Hex Trust, a digital asset financial institution specialising in custody, staking, and markets services, has appointed ... Read more
Scaling Across APAC: Why Cross-Border Payments Matter More Than Ever
In today’s digital-first economy, the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region has emerged as a global hotspot for fintech innovati... Read more