Changes Urged For Personal Injury Compensation Law

"); jQuery("#212 h3").html("

Related News Programmes

"); });

2023-01-19 HKT 17:06

Share this story

facebook

  • The Law Reform Commission says it's difficult for courts to make a precise assessment of a claimant's future loses and decide on a lump sum payment. Photo: RTHK

    The Law Reform Commission says it's difficult for courts to make a precise assessment of a claimant's future loses and decide on a lump sum payment. Photo: RTHK

The Law Reform Commission on Thursday recommended that courts be given the power to make periodical payment orders in personal injury cases – but only for “catastrophic” ones.

The commission issued a report after a sub-committee conducted a public consultation and studied similar legislation in other jurisdictions.

The commission said existing laws only allow courts to award damages in a lump sum after judges assess the claimants’ past and future losses.

However, it noted that this approach had come under criticism for being “imprecise and unscientific”.

“Assessing a ‘once and for all’ lump sum award is a difficult task for courts, as any assessment of damages for future pecuniary loss must consider what a plaintiff might have earned but for the injury, the earning capacity of the plaintiff after the injury and any additional expenses incurred following the injury,” the report wrote.

The commission made a number of recommendations, including legislating to empower courts to make periodical payment orders to cover all losses, including the costs of care and accommodation.

But it said the orders should be limited to catastrophic cases.

“It means a personal injury which is of such severity that it results in a permanent disability to the person requiring the person to receive long-term care and assistance in all activities of daily-living or substantial part thereof,” explained Raymond Leung, who chairs the Periodical Payments for Future Pecuniary Loss in Personal Injury Cases Sub-committee.

The report also suggested that the court review the order if there are changes in the need for and level of future care as a result of significant medical deterioration or improvement.

Leung said each claimant can only ask for one review, balancing the need for finality between the parties, and the possibility that changes could occur in the claimant’s circumstances.

RECENT NEWS

Fraud & AML In Asia: What Banks Need To Know In 2026

Fraud and AML in Asia have shifted over the past year. Alongside the system-level attacks that continue, panellists poi... Read more

Hong Kongs Total AUM Hits Record HK$42.2 Trillion In 2025

According to the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), Hong Kong’s total assets under management (AUM) reached a r... Read more

Hyundai Card Leverages Apple Pay To Target Gen Z Users

Hyundai Card launched six new debit and hybrid cards tailored to Apple Pay users in April. The South Korean issuer is t... Read more

DBS And Samsung Securities Partner For Global Wealth Expansion

DBS has signed a MoU with South Korea’s Samsung Securities to establish a strategic partnership in wealth management.... Read more

RedotPay Selects OpenPayd For Treasury Operations And Global Remittances

RedotPay has selected OpenPayd to enhance its treasury operations and cross-border remittance services. The company wil... Read more

JCB Rolls Out Contactless Transit Payments Across Taipei Metro

JCB has rolled out contactless payment acceptance on the Taipei Metro. The integration allows cardholders to tap physic... Read more