Changes Urged For Personal Injury Compensation Law

"); jQuery("#212 h3").html("

Related News Programmes

"); });

2023-01-19 HKT 17:06

Share this story

facebook

  • The Law Reform Commission says it's difficult for courts to make a precise assessment of a claimant's future loses and decide on a lump sum payment. Photo: RTHK

    The Law Reform Commission says it's difficult for courts to make a precise assessment of a claimant's future loses and decide on a lump sum payment. Photo: RTHK

The Law Reform Commission on Thursday recommended that courts be given the power to make periodical payment orders in personal injury cases – but only for “catastrophic” ones.

The commission issued a report after a sub-committee conducted a public consultation and studied similar legislation in other jurisdictions.

The commission said existing laws only allow courts to award damages in a lump sum after judges assess the claimants’ past and future losses.

However, it noted that this approach had come under criticism for being “imprecise and unscientific”.

“Assessing a ‘once and for all’ lump sum award is a difficult task for courts, as any assessment of damages for future pecuniary loss must consider what a plaintiff might have earned but for the injury, the earning capacity of the plaintiff after the injury and any additional expenses incurred following the injury,” the report wrote.

The commission made a number of recommendations, including legislating to empower courts to make periodical payment orders to cover all losses, including the costs of care and accommodation.

But it said the orders should be limited to catastrophic cases.

“It means a personal injury which is of such severity that it results in a permanent disability to the person requiring the person to receive long-term care and assistance in all activities of daily-living or substantial part thereof,” explained Raymond Leung, who chairs the Periodical Payments for Future Pecuniary Loss in Personal Injury Cases Sub-committee.

The report also suggested that the court review the order if there are changes in the need for and level of future care as a result of significant medical deterioration or improvement.

Leung said each claimant can only ask for one review, balancing the need for finality between the parties, and the possibility that changes could occur in the claimant’s circumstances.

RECENT NEWS

TOPPAN Edge Becomes Japans First Qualified VLEI Issuer

The Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) has announced TOPPAN Edge, a subsidiary of TOPPAN Holdings that p... Read more

SFC And Dubais DFSA Partner On Cross-Border Regulatory Cooperation

The Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), the independent regulator of the Dubai International Financial Centre (D... Read more

Toss To Launch Finance Super-App In Australia, Plans Won-Based Stablecoin

South Korea’s fintech unicorn Toss is preparing to launch its finance super-app in Australia before the end of this y... Read more

China Funds Research On Stablecoins And Cross-Border Oversight

China’s largest government-backed research funder has begun accepting applications for studies on stablecoins and the... Read more

XTransfer, CZBank Shanghai Branch Form Cross-Border Finance Partnership

XTransfer has entered into a partnership with the Shanghai branch of China Zheshang Bank (CZBank). The agreement was si... Read more

Brinc Launches VentureVerse Through Acquisition Of OG Club

Brinc, a Hong Kong-based venture acceleration and corporate innovation firm, has acquired OG Club, a decentralised auto... Read more