Changes Urged For Personal Injury Compensation Law

"); jQuery("#212 h3").html("

Related News Programmes

"); });

2023-01-19 HKT 17:06

Share this story

facebook

  • The Law Reform Commission says it's difficult for courts to make a precise assessment of a claimant's future loses and decide on a lump sum payment. Photo: RTHK

    The Law Reform Commission says it's difficult for courts to make a precise assessment of a claimant's future loses and decide on a lump sum payment. Photo: RTHK

The Law Reform Commission on Thursday recommended that courts be given the power to make periodical payment orders in personal injury cases – but only for “catastrophic” ones.

The commission issued a report after a sub-committee conducted a public consultation and studied similar legislation in other jurisdictions.

The commission said existing laws only allow courts to award damages in a lump sum after judges assess the claimants’ past and future losses.

However, it noted that this approach had come under criticism for being “imprecise and unscientific”.

“Assessing a ‘once and for all’ lump sum award is a difficult task for courts, as any assessment of damages for future pecuniary loss must consider what a plaintiff might have earned but for the injury, the earning capacity of the plaintiff after the injury and any additional expenses incurred following the injury,” the report wrote.

The commission made a number of recommendations, including legislating to empower courts to make periodical payment orders to cover all losses, including the costs of care and accommodation.

But it said the orders should be limited to catastrophic cases.

“It means a personal injury which is of such severity that it results in a permanent disability to the person requiring the person to receive long-term care and assistance in all activities of daily-living or substantial part thereof,” explained Raymond Leung, who chairs the Periodical Payments for Future Pecuniary Loss in Personal Injury Cases Sub-committee.

The report also suggested that the court review the order if there are changes in the need for and level of future care as a result of significant medical deterioration or improvement.

Leung said each claimant can only ask for one review, balancing the need for finality between the parties, and the possibility that changes could occur in the claimant’s circumstances.

RECENT NEWS

XTransfer Partners With Bank SinoPac HK To Expand Cross-Border Payment Services

XTransfer has entered into a collaboration with Bank SinoPac, through its Hong Kong Branch, to expand international ope... Read more

Standard Chartered To Launch Bitcoin And Ethereum Custody Services By 2026

Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) participated in Hong Kong Fintech Week 2025 (HKFTW25) as a strategic partner, annou... Read more

HashKey And Kraken Form Partnership On Institutional Tokenised Assets

HashKey and Kraken have announced a strategic partnership to promote institutional adoption of tokenised assets. The co... Read more

Reap Expands Global HQ With New Office In Hong Kong

Reap, a global fintech company providing stablecoin-enabled financial infrastructure, has expanded its global headquart... Read more

HeyMax Debuts In Hong Kong, Partnering With Cathay To Drive Regional Growth

Loyalty and travel rewards platform HeyMax has made its first international launch in Hong Kong, partnering with Cath... Read more