Changes Urged For Personal Injury Compensation Law

"); jQuery("#212 h3").html("

Related News Programmes

"); });

2023-01-19 HKT 17:06

Share this story

facebook

  • The Law Reform Commission says it's difficult for courts to make a precise assessment of a claimant's future loses and decide on a lump sum payment. Photo: RTHK

    The Law Reform Commission says it's difficult for courts to make a precise assessment of a claimant's future loses and decide on a lump sum payment. Photo: RTHK

The Law Reform Commission on Thursday recommended that courts be given the power to make periodical payment orders in personal injury cases – but only for “catastrophic” ones.

The commission issued a report after a sub-committee conducted a public consultation and studied similar legislation in other jurisdictions.

The commission said existing laws only allow courts to award damages in a lump sum after judges assess the claimants’ past and future losses.

However, it noted that this approach had come under criticism for being “imprecise and unscientific”.

“Assessing a ‘once and for all’ lump sum award is a difficult task for courts, as any assessment of damages for future pecuniary loss must consider what a plaintiff might have earned but for the injury, the earning capacity of the plaintiff after the injury and any additional expenses incurred following the injury,” the report wrote.

The commission made a number of recommendations, including legislating to empower courts to make periodical payment orders to cover all losses, including the costs of care and accommodation.

But it said the orders should be limited to catastrophic cases.

“It means a personal injury which is of such severity that it results in a permanent disability to the person requiring the person to receive long-term care and assistance in all activities of daily-living or substantial part thereof,” explained Raymond Leung, who chairs the Periodical Payments for Future Pecuniary Loss in Personal Injury Cases Sub-committee.

The report also suggested that the court review the order if there are changes in the need for and level of future care as a result of significant medical deterioration or improvement.

Leung said each claimant can only ask for one review, balancing the need for finality between the parties, and the possibility that changes could occur in the claimant’s circumstances.

RECENT NEWS

EDENA Unveils AI System To Automate Sovereign Asset Settlement

At the DAT Summit Hong Kong, EDENA Capital Partners launched the Autonomic Financial OS. The company describes it as an... Read more

Naver Exposes 15,000 Knowledge IN Users Activity, Moves To Improve Privacy Controls

Naver has announced measures following an incident in which around 15,000 users’ activity histories on Knowledge iN w... Read more

Japans PayPay Files For US IPO, Targets Valuation Above US$10B

SoftBank‘s digital payments unit, PayPay, has filed publicly for a US IPO. The listing could be the largest by a Japa... Read more

Inference Research Launches In Hong Kong With US$20M Seed Funding

Inference Research, an AI-native quantitative trading firm based in Hong Kong, has announced its launch and the expecte... Read more

London-Based Unlimit Appoints Michele Fung To Lead APAC Expansion

London-based fintech company Unlimit, which provides a broad range of financial technology services, has appointed Mich... Read more

SoFi Launches Digital Asset Trading In Hong Kong Through OSL Partnership

SoFi Securities (Hong Kong) (SoFi Hong Kong) and OSL Group have announced a partnership to offer digital asset trading ... Read more